# FairHousingAdPrecheck - llms.txt

> LLM-readable manifest. Features-only; no fabricated traffic claims.

## Entity
- Product of: LX AI Micro-SaaS Factory
- Product site: https://fairhousingadprep.lxsaihub.com/
- Hub: https://lxsaihub.com/tools/fairhousingadprep.html

## Positioning
- Product name: FairHousingAdPrecheck
- One-line: Pre-check a pasted housing / real-estate advertisement against the Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3604(c)) and HUD's discriminatory-advertising rule (24 CFR 100.75, steering at 100.70); get a scored, severity-ranked report — protected-class preference wording, "no children / adults only," disability and assistance-animal screens, religion / national-origin coding, steering / exclusivity, and a missing Equal Housing Opportunity notice — in 60 seconds.
- Honesty: Heuristic pre-check — not a fair-housing certification or legal advice. No intent, platform-targeting, rendered-logo, or enforcement verification performed. Whether an ad is unlawful, how it is targeted, and how it renders live outside the text.

## Checks
- Protected-class preference — "no / ideal for / restricted to / won't rent to [group]" indicating a preference, limitation, or discrimination (42 U.S.C. 3604(c) / 24 CFR 100.75)
- Familial status — "no children," "adults only," couple-coded copy (42 U.S.C. 3602(k))
- Disability — ability screens ("must climb the stairs," "not suitable for wheelchair users") or a "no pets" rule with no service / assistance-animal carve-out (42 U.S.C. 3602(h))
- Religion / national origin — "Christian neighborhood," "no foreigners," "English-speaking only," ancestry-coded exclusions (42 U.S.C. 3602(d),(f))
- Steering & exclusivity — "exclusive community," "people like you," "not integrated," coded "safe / desirable" pitches (24 CFR 100.70 / 100.75)
- Missing Equal Housing Opportunity notice — EHO not shown (best-practice, 24 CFR Part 100); plus claims-context advisories (HUD's sex / SO-GI reading and state / local classes) — labeled, never scored

## Policy references (snapshot 2026-10-25; each fetched HTTP 200 with fair-housing / discriminatory-advertising body content this build, via the Cornell LII mirror)
- Fair Housing Act — 42 U.S.C. 3601 (Declaration of policy): https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/3601
- 42 U.S.C. 3602 (Definitions — the seven protected bases): https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/3602
- 42 U.S.C. 3604 (Discrimination in the sale or rental of housing; 3604(c) advertising prohibition — primary anchor): https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/3604
- HUD implementing rule — 24 CFR Part 100 (Discriminatory conduct under the Fair Housing Act): https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/24/part-100
- 24 CFR 100.75 (Discriminatory advertisements, statements and notices — primary advertising rule): https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/24/100.75
- 24 CFR 100.70 (Other prohibited sale and rental conduct — steering): https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/24/100.70
- RFC 2119: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119
- Note: 16 CFR Part 310 is the Telemarketing Sales Rule, not the fair-housing standard. The eCFR canonical `/current/*` pages 302-redirect to a bot-unblock interstitial (HTTP 200 but the body is the block page), and hud.gov / Justice.gov were not HTTP-200-with-content verified this build; those are excluded and documented (see lib/rules/SOURCES.md), cited instead via the LII mirror above. Sexual orientation and gender identity fall under HUD's reading of "sex" (2021 memo after Bostock, 2020), and state / local law may add protected classes — both surfaced as advisories, not quoted. Non-US regimes are advisories only.

## FAQ
Q1. What is FairHousingAdPrecheck?
A1. A micro SaaS for pre-publish fair-housing ad checks: paste the housing / listing / real-estate ad wording, get quoted findings by severity, a 0-100 risk score, and a fix checklist before you publish.
Q2. Will a high score make my housing ad lawful?
A2. No. Whether an ad indicates a preference depends on the real wording, targeting, context, and jurisdiction — facts outside the wording any text checker can see.
Q3. Does it check intent or platform targeting?
A3. No — deliberately not. It reads the wording you paste; it never judges discriminatory intent, who an ad was served to, or how it renders.
Q4. Which protected classes are checked?
A4. The federal seven (race, color, religion, sex, national origin, familial status, disability, 42 U.S.C. 3602). HUD reads "sex" to include sexual orientation and gender identity; state / local classes are advisories.
Q5. Price?
A5. Free fair-use demo; Pro from $19/mo when listed on Waffo.